Surgeon Common Vivek Murthy needs tobacco-style warning labels for social media. NPR’s Leila Fadel talks to medical psychologist Michaeline Jensen, who has studied social media’s impact on children.
LEILA FADEL, HOST:
U.S. Surgeon Common Vivek Murthy needs warning labels on social media. Murthy wrote this week in a New York Occasions opinion piece that social media is, quote, “related to vital psychological well being harms for adolescents” and mentioned {that a} warning label will assist higher inform dad and mom concerning the dangers. However are warnings is one thing which can be vital and the way damaging is social media to younger folks? To reply that, we’re joined now by a medical psychologist who research social media and youngsters. Michaeline Jensen is an affiliate professor of medical psychology on the College of North Carolina at Greensboro. Welcome to this system.
MICHAELINE JENSEN: Thanks for having me.
FADEL: So primarily based on the analysis, how damaging is social media truly to adolescents’ well being?
JENSEN: So total, the analysis round how social media impacts psychological well being for younger folks is de facto nuanced. And the conclusions will not be in step with a quite simple social media harms psychological well being warning message as proposed by the Surgeon Common this week.
FADEL: OK.
JENSEN: Usually, it is sophisticated, principally, I suppose is the reply.
FADEL: Yeah.
JENSEN: And we won’t conclude that at inhabitants stage, social media causes modifications in adolescent psychological well being.
FADEL: So is there one thing to the concept of placing a warning label on social media? Are there sure websites which will harm children or harm their psychological well being and others that do not?
JENSEN: So social – or warning labels somewhat extra broadly could be efficient within the sense that they convey consciousness, they usually usually level folks in direction of what to do as an alternative of a dangerous exercise. So we do not know in any respect that social media on the whole causes psychological well being harms, nor certainly even that sure platforms are extra dangerous. Moderately what we all know is that some sorts of engagement on completely different platforms which can be social media, could be dangerous to adolescent psychological well being. So take, for instance, participating in unhealthy social comparisons – so, for instance, round bodily look or our bodies, bodily our bodies. That may be dangerous to shallowness and physique picture and even disordered consuming. However that isn’t the one approach that younger individuals are participating on social media, and certainly, many youth will not be participating in social media in that approach in any respect.
FADEL: So, you say it is sophisticated. I imply, what do you assume total of what Murthy’s proposing right here?
JENSEN: So the concept of a warning label, I feel is attention-grabbing within the sense that he is drawing consideration, and I wish to applaud him for this, to a extremely vital psychological well being challenges which can be presently confronted by adolescents in the present day. That half is essential, and I applaud him for that. Nonetheless, psychological well being difficulties themselves are sophisticated, they usually by no means have a single trigger. So it is arduous to say that slapping a warning label on social media will do a measurable quantity to enhance adolescent psychological well being.
FADEL: Are there issues about social media which were good in relation to adolescents engagements on-line there?
JENSEN: There definitely are. So, certainly, younger folks are inclined to report that their on-line experiences are extra optimistic than unfavourable, and sure sorts of engagement on social media are notably useful. So, as an example, extent to which younger individuals are participating on social media for social interplay and connection, particularly for youth who’re experiencing social isolation offline. So we noticed that very clearly through the pandemic, that that helps them. We additionally see that younger people who find themselves marginalized ultimately of their offline lives – they profit fairly significantly from on-line social help and social networks, particularly in the event that they lack these helps of their offline lives. So we have seen that kind of proof for say LGBTQ+ use who might not have nice helps of their face-to-face environments or with their households, however who discover actual connection and help of their on-line social networks.
FADEL: So that you talked about that warning labels on the face of it are good within the sense of bringing consciousness to points round a product. However you talked about how sophisticated that is. Are there interventions right here that you simply assume could be more practical than a warning label?
JENSEN: Yeah, so consciousness will solely get you to this point. Younger individuals are fairly conscious that there are purported hyperlinks between social media and psychological well being. I feel that what could be actually useful to younger folks and their dad and mom could be some evidence-based steerage on how they’ll interact on-line in ways in which do work for them. So dad and mom want steerage round the way to maximize these potential advantages and decrease the potential harms. They do not really want one other particular person simply telling them to be careful with none steerage on how to do this.
FADEL: Yeah. What concerning the limiting of mobile phone use? I imply, on Tuesday, the Los Angeles Faculty Board permitted a ban on college students utilizing cell telephones through the college day. What does analysis present us about how mobile phone use in class impacts studying, psychological well being?
JENSEN: Yeah, this can be a little bit of various query within the sense that this could limit entry to cell telephones particularly, not simply social media. However social media is definitely one of many major ways in which younger folks use their smartphones.
FADEL: Proper.
JENSEN: That is nonetheless a reasonably new query, and we do not have a ton of form of experimental or empirical proof on this, however we do know a little bit bit from analysis in different nations which have began rolling out these bans on how they could work. We do know that younger folks and their dad and mom are usually perceiving these each as positively and negatively. So, as an example, academics and oldsters within the Netherlands say that they are liking it, that they’ve this ban that they rolled out this 12 months. They are saying that their children are maybe much less distracted and connecting extra with their friends. However younger folks see each benefits and downsides. They are saying that they are much less distracted and extra related to their friends face-to-face. However possibly it is a little bit bit extra chaotic throughout passing durations. So I feel solely time will inform as we see proof about whether or not studying and different outcomes can enhance with issues like mobile phone bans on college campuses.
FADEL: Michaeline Jensen is an affiliate professor of medical psychology on the College of North Carolina at Greensboro. Thanks on your time.
JENSEN: Thanks.
Copyright © 2024 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This textual content is probably not in its remaining type and could also be up to date or revised sooner or later. Accuracy and availability might fluctuate. The authoritative file of NPR’s programming is the audio file.
