If the essential take a look at of whether or not a rustic stays a democracy is that the social gathering in energy can nonetheless undergo a setback on the poll field, India handed on Tuesday. Outcomes from the nation’s parliamentary elections — the most important on this planet — point out a surprising electoral setback for Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Get together (BJP).
“Setback,” to be clear, is a relative time period right here. On the finish of the staggered six-week election, Modi will grow to be solely the second Indian prime minister to win a 3rd consecutive time period. As of this writing, the BJP-led Nationwide Democracy Alliance (NDA) has received 289 seats within the 543-seat parliament and is main in yet another. A majority requires 272 seats.
The BJP itself has received 240 seats. That is greater than any Indian social gathering received between 1984 and 2009, when Modi first got here to energy, and in most elections, it might have been an incredible end result. However the expectations recreation is actual, and Modi and his social gathering misplaced it.
Through the marketing campaign, the NDA had a acknowledged aim of profitable 400 seats: a supermajority that might have allowed them to push by main legislative and constitutional adjustments. They didn’t come shut. And after profitable an absolute majority by itself within the final election, the BJP will seemingly now need to depend on its smaller coalition companions within the NDA to kind a authorities.
Exit polls over the weekend have been additionally wildly incorrect, with most incorrectly projecting round a 350-seat victory for Modi. (One of many more odd media moments on Tuesday was a outstanding pollster breaking down in tears on Indian TV over his inaccurate forecast and being comforted by his fellow panelists on digital camera. Not one thing you’re more likely to see from Frank Luntz.)
The opposition Congress Get together, which very just lately appeared headed for political oblivion underneath the management of Rahul Gandhi, the much-mocked fourth-generation scion of India’s most outstanding political dynasty, seems more likely to double its tally from the final election.
It’s miles too quickly to say it is the top and even the start of the top for Modi and the BJP, however they’re dealing with one thing they have not in fairly a while: significant opposition and uncertainty. And the world’s largest citizens confirmed it is nonetheless able to shock and independence.
So what went incorrect for Modi? In a rustic of 1.4 billion individuals, there might simply be that many causes, and it’s nonetheless too early to make sweeping statements. However the rising consensus appears to be that India’s financial system and pocketbook points took priority for a lot of voters over the BJP’s avowedly spiritual and ideological challenge.
Whereas India has seen speedy GDP development and infrastructure funding throughout the Modi years, unemployment has remained stubbornly excessive and, in lots of components of the nation, wage development has been static.
The ruling social gathering’s most vital losses got here in Uttar Pradesh, India’s most populous state and a longtime BJP bastion. Probably the most symbolically vital seat misplaced could also be in Ayodhya, the place earlier this yr Modi presided over the opening of the Ram Mandir, a large and controversial new Hindu temple constructed on the location of a historic mosque torn down by a Hindu nationalist mob in 1992.
Writing in Vox earlier this yr, Zack Beauchamp described the temple as “a monument to an unique imaginative and prescient of Hinduism constructed on the ruins of one of many world’s most exceptional secular democracies.” For the BJP to lose in Ayodhya was all however unthinkable.
However it appears not everybody was shopping for Modi’s ideological imaginative and prescient. In a prescient piece printed within the Washington Submit final week, the Indian journalist Barkha Dutt wrote that her interviews with voters all through the nation recommended that spiritual rhetoric and initiatives like Ram Mandir weren’t that salient as election points. Even BJP supporters tended to concentrate on financial development and Modi’s private qualities reasonably than sectarian issues.
“Once I requested what they want to see him change, invariably I heard two solutions — a higher concentrate on jobs and a firming down of the spiritual rhetoric,” Dutt wrote. One Uttar Pradesh farmer informed her, “Politics based mostly on faith is nugatory … What we would like is 24/7 electrical energy, sufficient water for irrigation and alternatives for our kids.”
As an alternative, Modi appeared to dial up the Hindu nationalist rhetoric within the closing weeks of the marketing campaign, accusing his rivals of planning to redistribute Hindu wealth to Muslims. It appears to not have labored.
India’s democratic resilience
Home and worldwide critics have been ringing alarm bells concerning the state of the world’s largest democracy’s political establishments for years, as Modi has presided over discriminatory insurance policies focusing on the nation’s spiritual minorities, in addition to the harassment of journalists, NGOs, and opposition politicians, not simply in India however overseas. India had been downgraded to an “electoral autocracy” on the extensively cited V-Dem index and is now categorised as solely “partly free” by the US NGO Freedom Home.
These autocratic tendencies have been on full show within the lead-up to the election, with opponents accusing BJP activists and the police of harassing opposition candidates into withdrawing.
It will be a stretch to say that Indian voters have rejected Modi’s strategy. He’s nonetheless arguably the hottest chief of a giant democracy on this planet. However the election outcomes a minimum of counsel that he’s not immune from the forces of political gravity — inflation, gradual development, polarization, anti-establishment sentiment — which have dragged down leaders elsewhere.
Modi will proceed to be the dominant pressure in Indian politics (and a big pressure in world politics) for years to come back, however his rise appears much less inevitable and invincible than it did just some days in the past, and the world’s largest democracy’s politics look only a bit extra democratic.
